Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region
Outstanding
Students’ Union
Minutes
of the 17th Annual General Meeting
Date: 22nd August, 2009 (Saturday)
Time: 2:49 - 7:14 p.m.
Venue: Room B2523, Academic Building,
City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR
Present:
|
02 Miffi Cheng |
07 Iris Law |
08 Cathy Wong |
|
04 Sylvia Ng |
07 Kaki Tang |
08 Emily Wong |
|
04 CK Cheung |
07 Sunny Wong |
09 Annis Au |
|
06 Connie Law |
08 Bonnie Chan |
09 Christy Chan |
|
06 Chris Yeung |
08 Kenneth Chan |
09 Nathan Kung |
|
07 Sophia Cheng |
08 Yandy Chan |
09 Connie Leung |
|
07 Ivy Ho |
08 Julie Lam |
09 Central Wong |
|
07 Benjamin Lam |
08 Wincy Ng |
09 Polly Yu |
Chairperson: Kaki Tang
Honorary Secretary: Wincy Ng (on behalf of Polly
Yu)
1.
Meeting
called to order
The 17th Annual General Meeting
was called to order by the Chairperson at 1449.
2.
To
pass the agenda for the 17th Annual General Meeting
The agenda was received and
adopted at 1452.
Approval proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Approval seconded by: Iris Law
19 voted for and the motion
was passed.
3.
To
pass the minutes of the 16th Annual General Meeting
Iris Law proposed that “08 Benjiman Lam” should be added to the list
of members present in the 16th Annual General Meeting (16th AGM) at 1455.
Amendment proposed by: Iris
Law
Amendment seconded by: Chris
Yeung
19 voted for and the amendment
was passed.
CK Cheung pointed out that the
term “YEC” was not explained in the
minutes.
Chris Yeung proposed to amend
all “YEC” and “YLC” appearing in the minutes as “Youth Elites’
Conference” and “Youth Leaders’
Congress”
respectively.
Amendment proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Amendment seconded by: Iris
Law
19 voted for and 1 abstained
from voting. The amendment was passed.
Benjamin Lam mentioned that he
still had not received the financial report of the 15th Executive Committee
(15th Ex-Co), which was supposed to be sent to all members by mid October 2008
as stated on line 10-11, page 5 of the minutes.
Kenneth Chan confirmed that
Dickson Leung had not yet sent the financial report to the OSU members.
Kwan Long Wong proposed that
the following amendments should be made at 1504:
“Vincent Siu” to “Vincent Sin” on line 10, page 8
“Sylvia” to “Sylvia Ng” on line 6, page 5 and line 4,
page 8
Amendment proposed by: Kwan
Long Wong
Amendment seconded by: Wincy
Ng
20 voted for and the amendment
was passed.
Iris Law proposed to add “Leung” after “Dickson” on line 8, page 5 of the
minutes at 1507.
Amendment proposed by: Iris
Law
Amendment seconded by: Kenneth
Chan
20 voted for and the amendment
was passed.
Chris Yeung proposed to adopt
the minutes of the 16th AGM at 1508.
Motion proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Motion seconded by: Iris Law
20 voted for and the motion
was passed.
4.
To
inquire the reports of the 16th Executive Committee
4.1 Report by Immediate
Past President
Chris Yeung gave a report on
behalf of the Immediate Past President, Joey Wong, who was absent from the 17th
Annual General Meeting. He commented that Joey Wong had been assisting the 16th
Executive Committee (16th Ex-Co) by giving advices in the previous year.
CK Cheung requested for
concrete examples of advices given by Joey Wong to the 16th Ex-Co.
Chris Yeung quoted the example
of Joey Wong offering help in settling the bank account problem in the
registration process.
Benjamin Lam asked for the
reasons for having problems with the registration procedure.
Chris Yeung explained that new
regulations had been set and Joey Wong had offered her help in the completion
of the registration procedure.
4.2 Report by External
Vice-President
CK Cheung asked if the format of
listing the names of the advisors and patrons should be standardized and why
some patrons had their names repeated on the advisors’ list.
Kwan Long Wong explained that
the names of the advisors and patrons were listed the same way as how their
names appeared on their respective webpages. This was to respect their own
preferences. He also clarified that Honorary Advisors would be those who gave
advice and guidance to the Ex-Co regardless of their financial support. Under
the Patron System, Bronze Patrons and Supreme Patrons would be those who had
donated $1000 and $500 to OSU respectively. Therefore, some patrons would have
their names appearing on both the patrons’ and advisor’ list.
Central Wong raised the query
of whether OSU would continue to seek help from these patrons and advisors in
the coming year.
Kwan Long Wong stated that
there were diverse opinions on this issue. Some proposed to invite more people
with higher social status to be Honorary Advisors while some thought that
effort should be put in persuading the patrons to continue their support to
OSU.
Central Wong questioned if the
17th Executive Committee (17th Ex-Co) should send invitation letters to these
advisors and patrons again.
Kwan Long Wong replied that
invitation letters would be sent to the potential advisors and patrons every
year. He admitted that the Patron System of the previous year was not too
successful as a result of the economic trauma.
Benjamin Lam doubted the terms “Bronze Patrons” and “Supreme Patrons” were appropriate as “Supreme” sounded more superior than “Bronze” when “Supreme Patrons” in fact donated less then “Bronze Patrons”.
Kwan Long Wong explained that
the amount of donation for “Supreme
Patrons”
might not have
been set reasonably. It was up to the decisions of the External Vice-President
(EVP) and Marketing Officer (MO) of the 17th Ex-Co to amend the amount.
Benjamin Lam suggested that “Supreme Patron” could be removed from Patron
System as it was quite confusing.
Kwan Long Wong stressed that
it was up to the decisions of the EVP and MO of the 17th Ex-Co to amend the
Patron System.
Chris Yeung added that the
range between not providing any financial support and donating $1000 to OSU was
too wide, and therefore “Supreme
Patron” is set up
to encourage more donation.
Connie Law asked if there were
“Platinum Patrons”, “Gold Patrons” and “Silver Patrons” in the Patron System.
Kwan Long Wong explained that
no one had chosen to be the above patrons the previous year resulting from the
mismatch of the amount of donation set with the actual economic situation.
4.3 Report by Financial
Secretary
Kenneth Chan commented that
the financial situation of OSU was quite unclear when he first took up the post
as the financial secretary and he had made a great effort in tidying up the
financial statement. In order to avoid chaos in the collection of membership
fee, a list recording the time a member paid the membership fee and his name
had been compiled since the previous year.
4.4 Approval of the 16th
Executive Committee Report
Chris Yeung proposed to
approve the 16th Ex-Co report at 1530.
Approval proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Approval seconded by: Iris Law
20 voted for and the motion
was passed.
5.
To
inquire the financial report of the year
Kenneth Chan reminded the
members that Dickson Leung had neither updated the financial report of the 15th
Ex-Co nor conducted a meeting to introduce the report to the members. He
commented that the actual financial situation of OSU differed from the last
financial report.
There was a net surplus of
$4100.80 this year. Kenneth Chan explained that the main source of the surplus
came from donations by the patrons. He had also introduced the following
features in this financial report:
1.
A
simpler presentation format was adopted.
2.
The
income and expenditure of each year’s AGM would be included in the financial
report of the following year instead of the previous year.
3.
A
stock list of OSU would be compiled as stated in the first remark of the report
(page 2).
4.
The
record of collection of membership fee would be included in the financial
report.
CK Cheung questioned the need
of issuing two Casher’s Orders.
Kenneth Chan explained that he
had not received the cheque book from last year’s financial secretary. He had
no other choices but to issue two Casher’s Orders and be charged a total of
$120.
CK Cheung asked that how did
OSU issue other cheques if the account holder had not been changed to Chris
Yeung and Kenneth Chan.
Kenneth Chan replied that Joey
Wong was hence invited to help settle this problem.
Wincy proposed that the
following amendments should be made at 1541:
“Parton” to “Patron” under the sub-heading “Revenue” on page 1
“decilded” to “decided” under “Remarks #2” on line 5, page 1
Amendment proposed by: Wincy
Ng
Amendment seconded by: Kwan Long
Wong
20 voted for and the amendment
was passed.
CK Cheung asked whether the
details of the balance sheet was confirmed and finalized. He requested for the
details of the stock list as well.
Kennth Chan explained that the
financial report was drafted with reference to the monthly statement issued on
22 July 2009. The financial statement would be updated once the monthly
statement of August was issued. He also mentioned that the General Fund of OSU
should be amounted to about $20,000 instead of $38,000 as stated in the
financial report of the 15th Ex-Co.
CK Cheung asked that why the
remaining stocks were not counted as current assets.
Kenneth Chan explained that
the remaining stocks should have zero value and not included in current assets.
In order to keep track of these stocks, an internal stock list was hence
compiled.
CK Cheung questioned if the
funding from the Committee on the Promotion of Civic Education was included in
the financial statement of the Youth Leaders’ Congress 2009 (HKYLC 2009).
Kenneth Chan clarified that
the funding was already included in the estimation.
Chris Yeung proposed that the
title “Balance
Sheet for the Year ended 15th August 2009” on the last page should be changed to “Balance Sheet as at
15th August 2009”.
Amendment proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Amendment seconded by: Iris
Law
20 voted for and the amendment
was passed.
Chris Yeung raised his query
towards the reliability of the amount of foundation fund ($702) of OSU as
stated in the financial report.
CK Cheung clarified that this
fund was created since OSU was set up but the actual amount of the fund was not
known. This amount ($702) was worked out from the balance sheet and was quite
reliable though it might not sound reasonable.
Benjamin Lam requested for
more details concerning the problem of changing the names of the account
holders.
Chris Yeung explained that the
account holders should be changed from Joey Wong and Dickson Leung to Chris
Yeung and Kenneth Chan, but the change was not yet completed.
Benjamin Lam questioned if the
account holders were to be altered again after they were changed to Chris Yeung
and Kenneth Chan as the 17th Ex-Co would be formed then.
Chris Yeung agreed with
Benjamin Lam and clarified that the account holders would be changed to the
President and Financial Secretary of the 17th Ex-Co directly.
Connie Law asked for the
reasons for not being able to change the name of the account holders throughout
the previous year.
Chris Yeung explained that all
signatures of the 15th Ex-Co were required in order to change the names of the
account holders. The 16th Ex-Co failed to collect all signatures and therefore
the names of the account holders remained unchanged.
Chris Yeung proposed to
approve the amended financial report of the 16th Ex-Co at 1554.
Approval proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Approval seconded by: Iris Law
20 voted for and the motion
was passed.
6.
To
inquire the PIC reports and the relevant financial reports of the functions
held throughout the year
6.1 2008-2009 Annual
Dinner
CK Cheung asked why the fact
that only one senior member joined the 2008-2009 Annual Dinner was a demerit.
Iris Law explained that it was
one of the objectives of the Annual Dinner to let senior and new members get to
know each other and the 2008-2009 Annual Dinner failed to achieve this
objective.
CK Cheung suggested that more
new members could be invited to the Annual Dinner.
Iris Law clarified that many
of the members of 2008 were preparing for the HKALE and unable to join the
Annual Dinner.
Sylvia Ng questioned the ways
of informing members of the Annual Dinner.
Iris Law replied that emails
were sent and calls were made to invite members to join the Annual Dinner.
Sylvia Ng expressed her
appreciation towards the effort hard work made by the 16th Ex-Co in contacting
the members of OSU. She suggested assigning coordinators to help contacting the
members so as to share the burden of the Ex-Co and raise the incentive for
members to join the Annual Dinner.
Kenneth Chan added that they
had been identifying active members since the 16th AGM and they would be given
priority when it came to making phone calls and informing them of the upcoming
activities.
CK Cheung asked if any
Honorary Advisors were invited to the Annual Dinner and presented with a
progress report afterwards.
Chris Yeung explained that the
16th Ex-Co had considered inviting the Honorary Advisors but did not do so as
there were not many members attending the Annual Dinner. An overall report
would be submitted to the Honorary Advisors after the 17th AGM.
6.2 Orientation Camp
2008-2009
Sylvia Ng doubted if the
decision of choosing a convenient campsite over a remote one which was
available at weekends was appropriate as many senior members could not join the
orientation camp as a result.
Kwan Long Wong explained that
the cost of renting a campsite on weekdays was significantly lower than that at
weekends. In addition, campsites on outlying islands would not be an ideal
venue since the environment was too crowded for conducting some mass games and
self-exploring games. A quieter and more spacious environment was preferred.
Sophia Cheng clarified that
she had contacted The Hong Kong Girl Guides Association three months in advance
to check if there were campsites available at weekends, but she was told that no
booking could be done until one month before the event was held. When she
contacted the staff again in June, she was informed that no campsites were
available at weekends as priority was given to events organized by the
association itself. Therefore, the orientation camp was held on weekdays.
CK Cheung requested for more
details on games conducted at the Langham Place Entrance.
Kwan Long Wong explained that
two games allowing campers to get to know more about their own abilities were
conducted at the entrance. He clarified that they had left before the security
took any actions.
CK Cheung asked what were the
games “3-Claps”
and “Cat-Walk” about.
Kwan Long Wong said that CK
Cheung could learn more about the games by participating in these games
himself.
CK Cheung demanded an
explanation for conducting games at the Langham Place Entrance. He also asked
for the places visited during the City Walk.
Kwan Long Wong reassured the
members that conducting games at the Langham Place Entrance had done no harm to
the reputation of OSU. The objective of these games was to let participants
explore more about their own abilities and therefore it was out of necessity to
play those games in public areas.
Kwan Long Wong explained that
there were a total of four checkpoints in the City Walk to let campers learn
more about the negative and darker sides of Hong Kong. These checkpoints
include Chungking Mansions in East TsimshaTsui, Temple Street and Portland
Street.
CK Cheung commented that it
was acceptable as long as the games played in public areas were not too
disturbing. He requested for examples of tasks to be completed at the
checkpoints in the City Walk.
Kwan Long Wong quoted the
example of tasks to be done in the Chungking Mansions. Campers were required
observe the environment and buy some snacks from the Southeast Asians.
CK Cheung stressed that safety
was the top priority in these activities and he believed that all participants
did enjoy the activities prepared by the Ex-Co.
Chris Yeung clarified that the
Ex-Co had seriously considered the safety of the activity and conducted a
pre-trip to evaluate the safety level.
Kwan Long Wong expressed his
gratitude towards the 16th Ex-Co for their effort paid in the preparation of
the orientation camp.
Sylvia Ng doubted if the
orientation camp had achieved the purpose of letting new members know more
about the missions of OSU.
Kwan Long Wong explained that
activities like singing the union song, introducing OSU and giving quizzes
about the history of OSU were included in the camp. He hoped that campers could
feel the spirit of OSU through the passion shown by the Ex-Co.
Sylvia Ng stressed that one of
the missions of OSU was to maintain the relationship between senior and new
members. Orientation camp was one of the few events through which senior
members could get to know about the new members and she did not wish that
members would only have superficial knowledge towards one another.
Kwan Long Wong admitted that
the date set for the orientation camp was not ideal and created inconvenience
for senior members who would like to join the camp. He mentioned that he had
been trying to alter the format of the orientation camp such that new members
could learn more about OSU and be more attracted to the programme. He commented
that the usual format of OSU orientation camp failed to achieve any of the
above purposes other than help building the bond between senior and new
members.
Chris Yeung said that the
reason for not choosing campsites on outlying islands was that the transportation
was really inconvenient. He added that the 16th Ex-Co received a very short
notice of the date of the Prizing Ceremony by the Yuen Long Junior Chamber, and
hence, they had difficulties in confirming the dates of the orientation camp
well beforehand.
Sylvia Ng appreciated the
innovation of the 16th Ex-Co on the design of programme, but she commented that
the rundown might not sound welcoming to the senior members. She hoped that
time would be allocated for senior members to chat with the new members.
Kwan Long Wong pointed out
that he had designed such a rundown only after he knew that no senior members
could join the orientation camp. He expressed his agreement towards the
suggestion made by Sylvia Ng.
Sylvia Ng thanked Kwan Long
Wong for his detailed explanation. She commented that the rundown was in fact
all right as long as senior members were briefed before they joined the camp
and free time was allocated for mingling.
Kwan Long Wong thanked Sylvia
Ng for her feedbacks and suggestions. He added that he was trying to improve
the quality of the orientation camp with reference to past experiences. He once
again expressed his gratitude towards the freedom and trust given by the 16th
Ex-Co to himself.
6.3 Hong Kong Young
Leaders’ Congress 2009 (HKYLC 2009)
Sophia Cheng proposed that the
title “Report
on Hong Kong Young Leaders’ Congress 2007 (HKYLC 2007)” on page 9 of the Annual Activities
Report should be amended as “
Report on Hong Kong Young Leaders’ Congress 2009 (HKYLC 2009)” at 1629.
Amendment proposed by: Sophia
Cheng
Amendment seconded by: Bonnie
Chan
24 voted for and the amendment
was passed.
Chris Yeung proposed to amend
the financial report of 2008-2009 Annual Dinner at 1640. He proposed to change
the amount of expenditure from $1602 to $1684.
Amendment proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Amendment seconded by: Kenneth
Chan
24 voted for and the amendment
was passed.
Sophia Cheng remarked that the
there were connections among the three workshops. Participants progressed from
the personal level to the community then global level as they joined the three
workshops.
Chris Yeung explained that the
net profit resulted from both the sponsorships and the fact that the actual
expenditure not exceeding the budget.
Kenneth Chan commented on the
success of HKYLC 2009. He said that many campers were interested to join the
HKYLC and OSU in the future.
CK Cheung challenged the fact
that there were only 34 applicants when the actual quota was 40 participants.
He suspected that this was due to the requirement of principal’s nomination for
enrolling the programme.
Bonnie Chan pointed out that
the low number of applicants might result from the outbreak of H1N1 influenza.
As many schools were suspended, students could not learn about HKYLC nor
receive the principal’s signature for enrolling the programme.
Kwan Long Wong stated that
this concern was also raised during the evaluation meeting. The requirement of
the principal’s nomination could ensure the quality of students joining the
programme while more students might be encouraged to apply if principal’s
nomination was not required.
CK Cheung did not think that a
principal’s nomination was necessary and he thought that the focus should be
placed on the problem of declining number of applicants.
Sylvia Ng suggested that a
nomination form could be attached with the invitation letter sent to the school
and let teachers nominate different students to join HKYLC.
Benjamin Lam appreciated the
hard work paid by the 16th Ex-Co and he thought that the HKYLC 2009 was very
meaningful and successful. He suggested that it would be better if there were
some guest speakers and the Ex-Co could seek help from the Honorary Advisors.
Sophia Cheng clarified that
they had tried to invite some tutors from the university but the tutors were
too busy to help as guest speakers.
Benjamin Lam commented that
the funding from the Committee on the Promotion of Civic Education was a huge
obstacle as little things could be done before the Ex-Co received the funding.
He suggested using the money from the General Fund before the funding was
received so that the preparation work could be more flexible.
Chris Yeung admitted that the
General Fund was quite limited and insufficient to cover some huge expenditure
(e.g. renting of the conference venue).
Miffi Cheng appreciated the
16th Ex-Co for their clear explanation. She requested for more details on the
number of participants.
Sophia Cheng reported that
there was 1 participant absent in Workshop 1 and 1 participant requested to
quit HKYLC 2009 after Workshop 2 was held. She commented that the overall
attendance was quite good. She added that a certificate would be awarded to
participants who had an attendance record of 80% or above.
Kwan Long Wong noted that the
16th Ex-Co was planning to hold a re-union and recruit more potential helpers
to facilitate the next HKYLC.
Miffi Cheng questioned on the
financial report of HKYLC 2009. She asked for more details on the cost and
coverage of the insurance bought.
Chris Yeung explained that the
insurance was bought upon request by the Committee on the Promotion of Civic
Education and the cost was $1500. The insurance only covered any serious
injuries or death caused during the event.
Chris Yeung proposed to have a
break and refreshment for 15 minutes after passing the Annual Activities Report
at 1650.
Motion proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Motion seconded by: Iris Law
24 voted for and the motion
was passed.
6.4 Outstanding Students’
Selection 2009 (OSS 2009)
Emily Wong reported that the
PICs from OSU were not allowed to join the committee of the Yuen Long Junior
Chamber (YLJC) and help co-organize the selection.
Sylvia Ng asked whether the
two PICs could attend the preparation meetings and had voting rights.
Chris Yeung commented that the
preparation work done by the two PICs were in fact the same as previous years.
The only difference was that OSU was no longer the co-organizer of the OSS.
Sylvia Ng explained that the
reason why PICs from OSU could not join the YLJC committee was that only
members of the YLJC would have voting rights. She thought that it was all right
if YLJC requested OSU to help with the contacting work, but it was important to
clarify that YLJC could only seek help from OSU through the President but not
calling the PICs from OSU directly.
6.5 Approval of the
Annual Activities Report of the 16th Executive Committee
Chris Yeung proposed to pass
the amended 16th Annual Activities Report at 1715.
Approval proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Approval seconded by: Iris Law
24 voted for and the motion
was passed.
The Annual General Meeting was
resumed at 1730.
7.
To
vote for the new OSU official logo
Chris Yeung noted that Bonnie
Chan had prepared a high resolution version of the current OSU logo to
facilitate the production of different souvenirs.
Connie Law commented that
proposal 3 looked very alike to the official logo of the Hong Kong Outstanding
Students’ Association.
Sylvia asked for details
concerning how to increase the resolution of the current logo.
Bonnie Chan explained that the
logo was magnified then its resolution was raised using the software Photoshop.
She stressed that no amendments were made to the logo.
CK Cheung questioned if the
colour combination of the current logo could be changed.
Kenneth Chan confirmed that
the current logo could be changed to any colours using Photoshop.
Emily Wong reported that she
had not received any replies from members who would like to vote through email.
Chris Yeung pointed out that
some senior members doubted if voting through email was appropriate. He added
that this was originally an item to be discussed in the AGM, but since no one
had voted through email, this matter was to be settled later.
Miffi Cheng stressed that the
reason for changing the official OSU logo was that the current logo lacked the
sense of design and looked out-dated.
Chris Yeung requested for
clarification of whether the proposal which received the highest vote would be
adopted.
Connie Law stated that simple
majority would be required for the proposal to be adopted according to the letter
issued to the members by the Logo Redesign Committee.
The voting result was as
follows:
|
Proposal |
No.
of Votes |
|
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
5 |
18 |
Hence, proposal 5 (keeping the
current OSU logo) was adopted.
CK Cheung suggested the 17th
Ex-Co to inform the OSU members of the voting results latest by 30 September,
2009. He reminded the members present in the AGM to discuss the need of to whom
should this results be told.
Chris Yeung stated that the
voting results could be notified to all members through email. It was only if
the results were notified through mail should they decide which particular
group of members was to receive the mail.
Sylvia Ng suggested the voting
results to be notified through mail as it was a serious matter.
Benjamin Lam commented that
sending email could be serious as well.
Kenneth Chan added that the
voting results should be uploaded to the OSU homepage.
Sylvia Ng clarified that there
were two main points of discussion: whether to notify all members or only
members who had paid the membership fee of the voting results; the deadline of
completing this task by the 17th Ex-Co.
CK Cheung suggested that the
target group and means of informing members of the voting results should be
decided by the 17th Ex-Co. The deadline would be discussed during this AGM.
Benjamin Lam proposed that the
17th Ex-Co should inform all members of the selection results before 30
September 2009 at 1804.
Motion proposed by: Benjamin
Lam
Motion seconded by: Connie Law
19 voted for and one abstained
from voting. The motion was passed.
8.
To
pass the election committee
Chris Yeung proposed to
appoint Benjamin Lam as the chairman and CK Cheung as the committee member of
the election committee at 1820.
Motion proposed by: Chris
Yeung
Motion seconded by: Iris Law
20 voted for and the motion
was passed.
9.
To
elect the 17th Executive Committee of the Union
There were a total of 11
candidates and the voting results were as follows:
|
|
Candidates |
For |
Against |
Abstain |
|
|
1 |
Kwan Long Wong |
20th |
17 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
Connie Law |
19th |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
Kenneth Chan |
21st |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
4 |
Polly Yu |
22nd |
17 |
0 |
1 |
|
5 |
Cathy Wong |
21st |
17 |
0 |
1 |
|
6 |
Christy Chan |
22nd |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
7 |
Nathan Kung |
22nd |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
8 |
Connie Leung |
22nd |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
9 |
Annis Au |
22nd |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
Central Wong |
22nd |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|
11 |
Yandy Chan |
21st |
14 |
3 |
1 |
Hence, the 17th Executive
Committee was formed:
|
Kwan Long Wong |
20th |
|
Connie Law |
19th |
|
Kenneth Chan |
21st |
|
Polly Yu |
22nd |
|
Cathy Wong |
21st |
|
Christy Chan |
22nd |
|
Nathan Kung |
22nd |
|
Connie Leung |
22nd |
|
Annis Au |
22nd |
|
Central Wong |
22nd |
|
Yandy Chan |
21st |
10.
Any
Other Business
Kwan Long Wong proposed to set
up the Constitution Review Committee (CRC) and appoint CK Cheung as the
convener of the CRC.
Motion proposed by: Kwan Long
Wong
Motion seconded by: Benjamin
Lam
18 voted for and the motion
was passed.
Sylvia Ng doubted if the method
of voting through email was appropriate and she suggested to add a standard
letter of authority into the Constitution. She also suggested the 17th Ex-Co to
hold some activities to deepen the understanding of the members towards the
Constitution.
11.
Adjournment
of the meeting
The meeting was adjourned by
the Chairperson at 1914.
Prepared by:
_________________
Polly Yu
General Secretary
Approved by:
________________
Kaki Tang
Chairperson